Read Aquinas, “On Natural Law” and answer the following questions: Do you think that “nature” provides any basis for knowing what we ought to do?How might you explain this basis without committing
Read Aquinas, “On Natural Law” and answer the following questions:
Do you think that “nature” provides any basis for knowing what we ought to do?
How might you explain this basis without committing the “naturalistic fallacy?”
Do you agree that the so-called “naturalistic fallacy” really does represent faulty reasoning? Why or why not?