Archive for month: November, 2020

Dear Tutor,

Please help me with my this assignment.

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

During our class discussions of the AIDS in Africa and the NIKE cases, we sought to define actionable principled arguments in favor of “doing the right thing”, whether ethical sourcing in Bangladesh and indonesia, or addressing the AIDS crisis in Africa. 

We’ll have more discussions on fair trade, sustainability and climate change.

How can we reconcile the freedoms necessary for a vibrant, enterprising economy that can provide for the needs and wants of an ever growing world population, with the understable desire that is also be fair, just and sustainable?

What are the key challenges to reconciling the conflicting interests of the various stakeholders? 

Who should decide? can this be done democratically?

The key to ESSAY 2 is to acknowledge that you cannot possibly tackle all these issues in a few words (nor does anyone have the right answer yet …). As a result identifying the key stakeholders, and the key conflicting interests (and principles) to be resolved.

Some of the guiding principles of CSR and sustainability have been stated by the United Nations and by other international organizations – but they are not binding, and many proclamations remain just that: proclamations. 

Will the drive to implementation flow top down, through government policy, or will it be bottom up from the collective will of citizens worldwide?

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Kinnari Darji

Read Aquinas, “On Natural Law” and answer the following questions: 

Do you think that “nature” provides any basis for knowing what we ought to do?

How might you explain this basis without committing the “naturalistic fallacy?”

Do you agree that the so-called “naturalistic fallacy” really does represent faulty reasoning? Why or why not?

Arthur and Melissa have been married for seven years but have been separated for the past year. The couple has two small children. They share custody. Imagine Arthur is your client, and, during a session, Arthur reveals that Melissa has recently become physically violent with him, slapping and punching him, but he has been too embarrassed to disclose the abuse. Client states that his wife has never acted this way before and he is afraid that the children may not be safe when left alone with her. Client states he is unsure about how to protect himself and, more so, his children.

1.      Describe Arthur’s level of lethality:

2.      Devise a safety plan for Arthur:

3.      Explain why you devised the safety plan the way you did:

Over the length of this course, you have heard about many controversial topics. Sitting right up at the top of the controversial list is privatization. Taking into consideration what you have already learned regarding privatization, in addition to what was discussed in this unit, break down the pros and cons of privatization. Summarize as to whether you are, or are not, in favor of privatized prisons. Be sure to provide specific details to support your reasoning as you describe the stance you choose.Your response must be at least four pages in length, double spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font, and include at least two outside sources. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying APA citations.

need rewrite, 1500 word……

minimum 8 academic sources