Unit 4 Assignment – Data Presentation

• Due Sunday by 11:59pm
• Points 100
• Submitting a text entry box or a file upload

Estimated time to complete: 2 hours

Instructions

Reference the following website for helpful information to complete this assignment:

• Healthcare Financial Management Association. (2018). Mapkeys (Links to an external site.). [Website]

You have recently been hired as a revenue-cycle management specialist at Raywood Memorial Hospital. Your direct supervisor, the VP of Revenue-Cycle Management, has asked you to prepare a presentation for the next stakeholder meeting. Keeping in mind, the stakeholder group is composed of both financial and non-financial professionals.

• Complete the fields in the attached table, illustrating national benchmark data, and RMH data.
  • Supply data of your choosing anywhere red text is present
• Create a brief Powerpoint presentation for the stakeholder meeting, summarizing the data contained in the excel document.
  • In one slide, explain the RMH’s overall fiscal condition, as defined by the metrics in the excel document.
  • Highlight three metrics (one per slide)
    • Briefly explain to the stakeholders why you chose those three to focus on for the purpose of this meeting.
    • Explain the relationship between national benchmarks and RMH data; providing explanations for data that falls short of, and exceeds, the benchmark.
  • Summarize RMH’s “next steps” in a closing slide
  • Include a minimum of three references, APA style, in a final slide.

Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.

Submit:

• Data Presentation (PowerPoint)
• Excel document with completed data fields

Assignment File(s)

• HC 306 – U4A1 [Excel Document]

Rubric

HC306 Unit 4 Assignment – Data Presentation

HC306 Unit 4 Assignment – Data Presentation

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content	35.0 pts 5 Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors. 32.0 pts 4 Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed. 28.0 pts 3 Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial. 25.0 pts 2 Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors. 21.0 pts 1 Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement. 0.0 pts 0 There is no evidence of a defined statement.	35.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis PRICE-P	45.0 pts 5 Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. 41.0 pts 4 Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. 36.0 pts 3 Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. 31.0 pts 2 Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities. 27.0 pts 1 Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus. 0.0 pts 0 Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.	45.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing	10.0 pts 5 The paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling. 9.0 pts 4 The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication. 8.0 pts 3 The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication. 7.0 pts 2 The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication. 6.0 pts 1 The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning. 0.0 pts 0 The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.	10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA PRICE-I	10.0 pts 5 The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references. 9.0 pts 4 The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 8.0 pts 3 The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 7.0 pts 2 The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 6.0 pts 1 Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references. 0.0 pts 0 There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.	10.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0

Ecosystem Paper

Select an ecosystem in your area (forest, lake,grassland).

Write a 525- to 700-word paper explaining the following:

1) Describe the structure of your ecosystem including important abiotic features and dominant plant and animal species.
2) Explain some functions/processes of your ecosystem including one nutrient cycle and one food chain.
3) Give two examples of species interactions (predation, competition, mutualism, etc.) that occur in your ecosystem.
4) Identify an invasive species in your ecosystem. Explain its effects on the ecosystem and efforts to control or eradicate it.

Include two outside references.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Strategic Alternatives

Read the “Staying on Course with Strategic Metrics” article. As a future health care administrator, you will be required to evaluate the strategies, efficiency, efficacy, and outcomes of your department or strategic business unit (SBU). After examining the article, analyze the strategic alternatives that result from monitoring strategic metrics pertaining to your in the role of a department or SBU manager. List at least two strengths and weaknesses of basing strategic alternatives solely on strategic metrics. Support your primary response with at least one scholarly source. Provide in-text citations and complete references for all sources used. Format your post according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts.

As the Office Manager for a large physician practice, you are charged with leading the implementation of a new Electronic Health Record (EHR) system for the entire practice. You want to create a presentation that illustrates how health information exchange works and how it can be used to assist in the transition to the EHR. To begin your presentation, explain how paper medical records are managed at the clinic currently. Explain how the EHR will improve operations. Research how your state’s Regional Health Extension Center (RHEC) and Regional Health Information Exchange can help support the implementation process. Explain the various models of Health Information Exchange and differentiate between them.

Requirements

Create a 10–15 slide PowerPoint® presentation to persuade the physicians that it is beneficial to utilize the RHEC during the EHR implementation process and include the below information:

• How the EHR can improve operations
• How Regional Health Extension Center (RHEC) and Regional Health Information Exchange can assist in the transition to an EHR
• Various models of health information exchange

Summaries the articles

• • Mikolaizak, A., Simpson, P., Tiedemann, A., Lord, S., Caplan, G., Bendall, J., Howard, K. and Close, J. (2013), ‘Intervention to prevent further falls in older people who call an ambulance as a result of a fall : a protocol for the iPREFER randomised controlled trial’, BMC Health Services Research, vol 13, no 1 .
    

  
  

  • Mikolaizak, A., Simpson, P., Tiedemann, A., Lord, S. and Close, J. (2013), ‘Systematic review of non-transportation rates and outcomes for older people who have fallen after ambulance service call-out’, Australasian Journal on Ageing, vol 32, no 3 , pp 147 – 157.
    

  
  

  • Simpson, P., Bendall, J., Patterson, J., Tiedemann, A., Middleton, P. and Close, J. (2013), ‘Epidemiology of ambulance responses to older people who have fallen in New South Wales, Australia’, Australasian Journal on Ageing, vol 32, no 3 , pp 171 – 176.
    

  
  

  • Simpson, P., Bendall, J., Tiedemann, A., Lord, S. and Close, J. (2014), ‘Epidemiology of emergency medical service responses to older people who have fallen : a prospective cohort study’, Prehospital Emergency Care, vol 18, no 2 , pp 185 – 194.
    

  
  

  • Simpson, P., Bendall, J., Toson, B., Tiedemann, A., Lord, S. and Close, J. (2014), ‘Predictors of nontransport of older fallers who receive ambulance care’, Prehospital Emergency Care, vol 18, no 3 , pp 342 – 349.
    

  
  

  • Mikolaizak, A., Lord, S., Tiedemann, A., Simpson, P., Caplan, G., Bendall, J., Howard, K. and Close, J. (2018), ‘Adherence to a multifactorial fall prevention program following paramedic care : predictors and impact on falls and health service use: results from an RCT a priori subgroup analysis’, Australasian Journal on Ageing, vol 37, no 1 , pp 54 – 61.